Control matters more than scale
Many investigation firms grow by outsourcing work to subcontractors. On the surface, it looks efficient. It allows agencies to say yes to more cases, cover more geography, and keep overhead low.
But outsourcing comes with tradeoffs that don’t show up in a proposal or an hourly rate. Different investigators bring different habits, different documentation standards, and different interpretations of what “done” looks like. Over time, that inconsistency erodes quality.
At Origin, we made a deliberate decision to staff investigations exclusively with in-house personnel.
“Control isn’t about micromanagement. It’s about protecting the integrity of the work.”
Why staffing decisions shape investigative outcomes
Investigations aren’t linear. Facts emerge unevenly. Priorities shift. What looks important on day one may be irrelevant by day ten.
When teams are internal, those adjustments happen smoothly. Investigators understand how analysts will review their work. Analysts understand how information was gathered in the field. Case managers maintain continuity from intake through reporting.
That shared understanding reduces friction and improves judgment across the entire investigation.
Outsourced models, by contrast, often rely on handoffs. Those handoffs create gaps, assumptions, and delays that compound as a case grows more complex.
Consistency isn’t cosmetic, it’s foundational
Consistency is not about formatting or style. It’s about how evidence is approached.
Internal teams operate under the same expectations for observation, documentation, corroboration, and restraint. Everyone understands what must be recorded, how sources are handled, and why details matter.
That consistency becomes critical when findings are reviewed by attorneys, insurers, executives, or regulators who are looking for clarity rather than volume.
“Good investigations don’t overwhelm. They explain.”
Confidentiality requires fewer hands, not more
Every additional third party increases exposure. Subcontracting expands the number of people, systems, and organizations that touch sensitive information.
Even well-intentioned partners introduce risk simply by existing outside the agency’s direct control.
By staffing internally, we limit access to vetted professionals operating under unified policies and oversight. Sensitive information stays within a controlled environment, reducing the chance of leaks, miscommunication, or improper handling.
Accountability is clearer when teams are internal
When everyone works under the same roof, accountability is straightforward.
If something needs clarification, correction, or escalation, there is no ambiguity about responsibility. Supervisors can review work directly. Adjustments happen immediately. Lessons learned carry forward.
In outsourced models, accountability is often diluted across contracts, availability, and scope limitations.
“Clear ownership leads to cleaner outcomes.”
Faster pivots without sacrificing discipline
Investigations change quickly. New facts can alter strategy overnight.
Internal staffing allows teams to pivot without renegotiating scope, waiting for availability, or onboarding new personnel midstream. The work continues with momentum intact.
Importantly, speed does not come at the expense of discipline. Adjustments are made within the same framework, standards, and documentation requirements.
Reporting that reflects how the work was done
Because investigators, analysts, and report writers operate within the same system, reporting reflects reality, not reconstruction.
There’s no need to translate field notes across styles or reconcile different investigative philosophies. Findings are presented with context, clarity, and continuity.
That matters when reports are relied upon for decisions with real consequences.
Final thoughts
Staffing is not a logistical detail. It’s a strategic choice that shapes every aspect of an investigation.
By keeping our work in-house, we protect quality, confidentiality, and accountability from the first conversation to the final report. It’s not the fastest way to scale, but it’s the right way to investigate.
Joshua leads Origin’s investigative operations with a steady hand and a sharp eye for detail. He specializes in managing complex field investigations and ensuring that every case is conducted with discipline, professionalism, and purpose. Outside the operational grind, Joshua values time spent recharging, staying physically active, and maintaining the focus that serious investigative work demands.
Joshua Passas
Director, Investigation Division
Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up to get the most recent blog articles in your email every week.
